<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Potential Pleo Packaging?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/</link>
	<description>All about Ugobe, and their new robotic toy Pleo, the Dinosaur robot!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:44:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lu Bu</title>
		<link>http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/comment-page-1/#comment-6606</link>
		<dc:creator>Lu Bu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 23:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/#comment-6606</guid>
		<description>Number one to me looks the best since it can consume more customers to think that it is complex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number one to me looks the best since it can consume more customers to think that it is complex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/comment-page-1/#comment-4431</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Dec 2006 14:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/#comment-4431</guid>
		<description>First, I know this is a product trying to be &#039;sold&#039;, so certain terminology and such must be used. But as a techie knowing a lot about the Pleo I say the more technical one is best, but I definetly think the mechanical view is necessary for a group of consumers in store that might miss what Pleo can do as another furby lump.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I know this is a product trying to be &#8217;sold&#8217;, so certain terminology and such must be used. But as a techie knowing a lot about the Pleo I say the more technical one is best, but I definetly think the mechanical view is necessary for a group of consumers in store that might miss what Pleo can do as another furby lump.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/comment-page-1/#comment-1080</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/#comment-1080</guid>
		<description>Then again, I suppose you can see his cuteness thru the front side, so the technical discussion might be okay if impressive...and it might spark interest among the mechanically minded.  So, I like the Reasons from #3 and the image from #1 or 2 might be fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Then again, I suppose you can see his cuteness thru the front side, so the technical discussion might be okay if impressive&#8230;and it might spark interest among the mechanically minded.  So, I like the Reasons from #3 and the image from #1 or 2 might be fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/comment-page-1/#comment-1079</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 18:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/#comment-1079</guid>
		<description>Number 3 says it all.  Some good reasons to own Pleo.  I don&#039;t like the skeletal images of the other 2...looks dismembered, robotic and the opposite of cute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 3 says it all.  Some good reasons to own Pleo.  I don&#8217;t like the skeletal images of the other 2&#8230;looks dismembered, robotic and the opposite of cute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simone</title>
		<link>http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Simone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 09:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>I choose the nr 3, cos i think it&#039;s more attractive and commercial... 
the 2nd is more techinically but not commercial. I think should be better a fusione between the two boxes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I choose the nr 3, cos i think it&#8217;s more attractive and commercial&#8230;<br />
the 2nd is more techinically but not commercial. I think should be better a fusione between the two boxes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dolata</title>
		<link>http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>dolata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 12:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/#comment-82</guid>
		<description>NUMBER 2, MORE SERIOUS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NUMBER 2, MORE SERIOUS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raoul Teeuwen</title>
		<link>http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Raoul Teeuwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2006 11:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pleobot.com/2006/08/potential-pleo-packaging/#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Number 3 is my favorite!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 3 is my favorite!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
